Hybrid -- Scale
Home & Garden Hybrid Account: What 276 Optimization Actions Look Like Over 9 Months
An international Home & Garden hybrid account operating at $5,000 per month reduced CPA from $204.19 to $109.18 (-47%) and grew conversions from 61 to 100 (+64%) over a 90-day window, supported by 276 documented optimization actions across a longer engagement.
CPA Reduction
$109.18
-46.5%
Conversions
100.42 (+63.9%)
Conversion Value
$11,208
An international Home & Garden hybrid account (both e-commerce and lead-generation objectives) operating at a $5,000 monthly Google Ads budget reduced cost-per-acquisition by 46.53% (from $204.19 to $109.18) and grew conversion volume by 63.95% (from 61.25 to 100.42) over a 90-day optimization window. The account has the richest documented optimization history in this report: 276 logged actions across the underlying engagement, reflecting sustained operational discipline over multiple quarters.
Key Takeaways
- CPA reduced 46.5% on an international account operating across multiple languages and regions.
- Conversion volume grew 63.9% while total spend declined by 12.3%.
- 276 optimization actions documented in the diary — the highest cadence in this report. Averaging across a broader engagement, this is approximately one action per day sustained for 9+ months.
- Account structure includes campaigns in multiple languages (Italian, German, English), each requiring its own search-terms hygiene and negative-keyword infrastructure.
The Account
A scale-tier hybrid account in the Home & Garden vertical, selling high-value items internationally across Italian, German, and English-language markets. The business runs both direct e-commerce and lead-generation funnels depending on product category. Monthly Google Ads budget is approximately $5,000, with a target ROAS of 3.0x and a target CPA of $200 for lead-generation campaigns.
The international footprint is what makes this account genuinely difficult to manage: each language and region has its own search patterns, its own competitive environment, and its own set of low-intent query patterns to exclude.
The Challenge
| Metric | Baseline (90 days) |
|---|---|
| Spend | $12,506.65 |
| Conversions | 61.25 |
| Conversion Value | $12,052.95 |
| CPA | $204.19 |
| Clicks | 31,206 |
| Impressions | 1,512,275 |
CPA at $204 was exactly at the $200 target ceiling, but conversion volume was below where the budget should have been producing. The account had drift across multiple regional campaigns — no single campaign was catastrophically broken, but several were underperforming their regional potential.
The Approach
Step 1: Per-region search-terms hygiene. Each of the four language/region campaigns ran its own search-terms review cycle. Flagged terms in one language do not necessarily apply to others, so the exclusion lists were maintained separately per region.
Step 2: Cross-region pattern recognition. Where recurring low-intent themes appeared in multiple regions, the team escalated them to account-level exclusions, preventing recurrence elsewhere.
Step 3: Budget rebalancing across regions. Weekly reviews identified which regional campaigns were performing at or above target, and budget was shifted toward them from the underperforming regions.
Step 4: Long-term diary discipline. Every action was logged in the account diary, which became a tactical memory system: teams could look back at what was tried 3 months ago and avoid repeating dead ends.
The Results
Over the 90-day optimization window (September 20 to December 19, 2025):
| Metric | Before (90 days) | After (90 days) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spend | $12,506.65 | $10,964.17 | -12.3% |
| Conversions | 61.25 | 100.42 | +63.9% |
| Conversion Value | $12,052.95 | $11,208.00 | -7.0% |
| CPA | $204.19 | $109.18 | -46.5% |
| Clicks | 31,206 | 35,585 | +14.0% |
| CTR | 2.06% | 1.89% | -8.3% |
CPA moved from just above target ($204 vs. $200) to nearly half of target ($109). Conversion volume grew substantially even as spend declined. Conversion value is essentially flat, which suggests that the optimization was more effective at the lead-generation side of the hybrid funnel than the pure e-commerce side — a legitimate tradeoff when lead value tracking is not fully configured on all touchpoints.
Lessons Learned
-
International accounts need per-region exclusion lists. Treating a multi-region account as a single pool is the most common mistake in this setup. Query patterns that are legitimate in one language are often noise in another.
-
Long-term diary discipline compounds. 276 actions over the full engagement means the team has a searchable history of what worked and what did not. This memory system is itself a competitive advantage.
-
Hybrid accounts need hybrid metrics. Looking at CPA alone works for the lead-gen side; looking at ROAS alone works for e-commerce. The team needs to report on both and weight them by contribution to account spend.
-
Spend decline is consistent with volume growth on international accounts too. The same pattern holds: remove waste, consolidate working spend, let the algorithm find more of what is converting.
Methodology Note
Data sourced from a managed Google Ads account in the Home & Garden vertical operating at the scale budget tier with an international (multi-region) footprint and a hybrid business model. All identifying information has been removed. Performance metrics reflect the best 90-day window (September 20 to December 19, 2025) compared against the prior 90-day baseline (June 20 to September 19, 2025). The account has 276 documented optimization actions logged across its broader engagement history. Metrics reported in USD.
Try Lyra Free
8 Google Ads optimization tools. 14-day free trial.
Start Free Trial14-day free trial · Cancel anytime
Start Optimizing Your Google Ads Today
14-day free trial. All 8 tools included. Cancel anytime during the trial.
Start Free Trial