Lead Generation -- Scale
Home & Garden Lead Generation: Interior Design CPA Cut 64%
A scale-tier Home & Garden interior design lead-generation account at a $3,000 monthly budget reduced cost-per-lead from $177.50 to $63.45 (-64%) and grew conversions from 42 to 95 (+125%) over a 90-day window.
CPA Reduction
$63.45
-64.3%
Conversions
94.50 (+125.0%)
vs. $300 target CPA
79% below target
A scale-tier lead-generation account in the Home & Garden vertical (interior design services) operating at a $3,000 monthly Google Ads budget reduced cost-per-lead from $177.50 to $63.45 (-64.25%) and grew conversion volume from 42 to 94.50 (+125%) over a 90-day optimization window. The account is now operating 79% below its $300 target CPA.
Key Takeaways
- CPA reduced 64% from $178 to $63 — moving dramatically below the $300 business target.
- Conversion volume more than doubled (+125%) while total spend declined 20%.
- Account runs separate campaigns for different service categories (kitchen, bathroom, etc.) with campaign-level budget optimization.
- Budget was actively rebalanced across campaigns during the window to concentrate spend on the best performers.
The Account
A scale-tier lead-generation account in the Home & Garden vertical, specifically interior design services (kitchen, bathroom, and related categories). Monthly budget around $3,000, target CPA of $300. The account runs separate campaigns per service category to allow independent budget and performance management.
The Challenge
| Metric | Baseline (90 days) |
|---|---|
| Spend | $7,454.91 |
| Conversions | 42.00 |
| CPA | $177.50 |
| CTR | 1.99% |
| Impressions | 114,287 |
CPA at $178 was well inside the $300 target, but conversion volume was modest for the budget level. The team identified that category-level rebalancing could unlock substantial additional volume.
The Approach
Step 1: Category-level audit. Each service-category campaign was reviewed independently. Kitchen and bathroom campaigns were compared for efficiency and volume potential.
Step 2: Budget rebalancing. Budget was moved from underperforming categories ($30 daily to $20) and redirected to better-performing display campaigns ($15 to $25).
Step 3: Search-terms hygiene. Standard weekly review cadence applied across all category campaigns.
Step 4: Keyword list maintenance. Negative keyword lists were expanded to prevent cross-category query confusion.
The Results
Over the 90-day optimization window (November 2, 2025 to January 31, 2026):
| Metric | Before (90 days) | After (90 days) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spend | $7,454.91 | $5,996.23 | -19.6% |
| Conversions | 42.00 | 94.50 | +125.0% |
| CPA | $177.50 | $63.45 | -64.3% |
| CTR | 1.99% | 2.28% | +14.6% |
| Impressions | 114,287 | 175,255 | +53.3% |
| Clicks | 2,270 | 3,997 | +76.1% |
Impressions grew 53% while spend declined 20%, indicating a dramatic CPC improvement driven by better auction mix. Click volume grew 76% and conversion volume grew 125%, meaning each click was substantially more likely to convert.
Lessons Learned
-
Category-level budgets allow precise rebalancing. Running kitchen and bathroom as separate campaigns, rather than a single “interior design” campaign, made it possible to identify which category was producing and move budget accordingly.
-
Lead-gen accounts benefit from impression growth. Unlike ecommerce accounts where waste-removal typically reduces impressions, this account grew impressions 53% while reducing spend — the cheaper impressions were more relevant.
-
Small-budget local accounts have big optimization upside. On a $3,000 monthly budget, a 64% CPA reduction is worth $3,500+ in quarterly savings at the same conversion volume — material for a small business.
-
Always measure against business target, not against baseline. This account now operates at 21% of target CPA, which opens a conversation with the business about scaling the budget for more volume.
Methodology Note
Data sourced from a managed Google Ads account in the Home & Garden vertical (interior design services) operating at the scale budget tier with a local footprint. All identifying information has been removed. Performance metrics reflect the best 90-day window (November 2, 2025 to January 31, 2026) compared against the prior 90-day baseline (August 3 to November 1, 2025). The account executed 46 documented optimization actions during the measurement period. ROAS metrics are not cited because lead-generation accounts in this dataset do not reliably track conversion value. Metrics reported in USD.
Try Lyra Free
19 Google Ads optimization tools. 14-day free trial.
Start Free TrialNo credit card charged until trial ends
Start Optimizing Your Google Ads Today
14-day free trial. All 19 tools included. No credit card charged until trial ends.
Start Free Trial